Unique Free Articles. Free submission.
Search:

Unique Free Article:
'straw man ~ What's in your NAME? - Les Raketti Copyright-name.com ~ all caps name'

Article Source: http://www.unique-free-articles.com


Permission to repost granted with full disclosure/credits. Les Raketti www.copyright-name.com' >www.copyright-name.com




"....As we learned from Bill Clinton when he was formally questioned in regard to the Monica Lewinski is.....
.....straw man,all caps name,legal name,redemption,copyright....."

A teaser - or if you will - The Cat Scan Test ;-)

This is an excerpt and augmentation of another article,'How to use the Copyright notice' to clarify conceptually what is the legal definition of your name.

Supposing I scribbled the word 'cat' in frontispiece of you and I asked you what is it?

What answer would you give me?

Is it a animal?

Or is it just marks on a piece of paper?, Or is it just letters on a piece of paper?, Or is it just a word on a piece of paper?

The 'cat' only exists as a word on paper.

The word 'cat' on a piece of paper can in no degreeADV Smallness ever be a cat in the certain cosmos can it? And the only way a cat can be a cat on paper is if we agree that is what the word or symbol represents. As we learned from Bill Clinton when he was formally questioned in regard to the Monica Lewinski issue there are at least six anomalous definitions.

Now what if I wrote the words your name in the capitalized form of 'FIRSTNAME SECONDNAME FAMILYNAME'? Does this hold any significance?

It is just letters on a paper - nothing else - that is until you sign a piece of paper as an honorable man/woman saying or acknowledging that it is you. But we can also agree to ourselves that it represents something else ie: C=creator A=always on T=top.

And if cats exist in the true world, which cat are we talking about - a cat can be any cat or the word cat could be represent something else - who is to know?

Unless one goes the scenes and finds out what the author who wrote the word 'cat' revenue by it, do we really know? In other words, nevermore assume the meaning of definitions particularly legal definitions such as 'citizen' or even the word 'is'. If you weren't at home and you didn't live where you are then I suspect you wouldn't be in the realm of the living, wouldn't you? (according to the Bible, isn't the body the temple of the soul?).

Consider this, your FIRSTNAME SECONDNAME FAMILYNAME is always attached to an address that is how 'it' is tracked or identified (identity id = thing, ident = identified). And this is the key point, 'it' can in no degreeADV Smallness represent you unless you denote it is by your actions, your behavior or your conclusive to that name.
Now if someone asks you, 'Are you your FIRSTNAME SECONDNAME FAMILYNAME that lives at such and such address, how are you going to respond'?

Before you answer - remember you just like a cat only live where you are in the true world. It is in CAPS to distinguish it from your humaneN Mankind given and family names. After all there may be more than one version of your FIRSTNAME SECONDNAME FAMILYNAME out there.

The point is your name in caps is only a fictional creation of whoever created the name as just like the word cat it does not exist really. The name on paper written in full caps is something in toto Latin different, a legal creation owned by whoever created it, de jure LatinN Clergy - the STATE.

Now if you betoken that you are that FIRSTNAME SECONDNAME FAMILYNAME in CAPS who is going to tell you contrariwise if it is not in your best interest to do so? Certainly not the authority nor any agent of sovereign nor anyone associated with the legal domain as that would be a conflict of interest.

With any application you have prolific for any type of sovereign suffer be it a driver's license, citizenship, a intermarriage certificate, a passport you de jure LatinN Clergy by default have become that FIRSTNAME SECONDNAME FAMILYNAME but only you indicated so - either by your actions or purely you didn't disaffirm it - but is this the truth in the true world? Lets test this premise with a cat scan.

A cat who lives in the natural nature only recognizes you in the flesh. You typically answer to your first name, a given name that you go by and you belong to a family group of another name. Who can say anything different?

Let me press the point even further as we all have been so blind sided by the legal creation we don't know who we really are. Your FIRSTNAME SECONDNAME FAMILYNAME, the name on paper or as read, as far as the cat is concerned does not exist and that is the veritable truth. Using the test of the cat scan what does this mean?

It ways and means clearly that you as a public being belong under God and if you attach yourself to the LEGAL ENTITY then you belong to CEASAR or the STATE. Now I am by no revenue a bible thumper but there in that booklet exists the saying, 'Give to CEASAR that which is CEASAR's and give to God that which is God's'. Why? Well, you are playing with court rules. 'You cannot serve two masters!', The second quote, I that also is from that same booklet - as the Bible deals with not only redemption in spirit in the tradition of organized religion but also redemption in law which most of us are not aware of.

This is why if you enter the legal game you can on no occasion win. So if you are in a conflict of interest with the plight you always are at a disadvantage as there you are operating under a capitalized FIRSTNAME SECONDNAME FAMILYNAME. And who owns the court, the State. Going by that name you are minister bound to the rules and regulation of the plight and the court's discretion to the detriment of your natural born freedoms.

In a sense things are rigged as your capitalized FIRSTNAME SECONDNAME FAMILYNAME is the only 'thing' that the legal/commercial firmamentN Originality can recognize. That's an artificial name they created as a derivative of your family and given names. Fiction is fiction and fiction and reality sine die meet. This includes the name your Bank account is in, the name your driver's licence is in, even your car and your house.

The legal globe can on no occasion give a hearing you, the flesh and blood national being as far as the legal firmamentN Originality is concerned you do not exist in their fictional globe of paper and electronic media and that my companion is the truth. Know who you are! Are you a fictionized legal entity a creation of the State or are you a creature of God?

But you are only in the legal game IF you connect yourself to it through the your capitalized FIRSTNAME SECONDNAME FAMILYNAME the fictional entity which only exists pastor on paper. In otherwords, it is understood that fiction can in no degreeADV Smallness be truth and truth can never in all ones born days be fiction as self evident as that may be, it bears repeating. We will get to what your options are later. And it is only through tacit accordance does that name exists in the minds of men.

What do I mean by tacit unison - if you don't recant by your words or actions that you are not 'IT' than you priest by default must be 'IT'.

It's a 'Got You', damned if you do and damned if you don't' as it is awkward to operate outside the legal/commercial earth particularly if you use the banking system which makes extensive use of your 'IT' name. Human beings are the only ones who can affirm truth and by in action so only we de jure LatinN Clergy can bring into existence what to no degree existed before. Let's first explore this concept a little further to take what makes us so powerful and unique if only we truly know who we are.

What you don't deny, you assume.

The assumption is if you sign your name to anything you are always affirming by your mark, your signature, the truth. That power can also be used against us. That is the power of the creator which is unique to us. Not the general in this case but the populace behind the scenes by not negatory they genetic a choice. Let me illustrate how that can be so.

What you don't deny, you acquire, this is a basic premise in law and a key to self responsibility.

The conquering Roman Army General addressing the populace as 'Citizens of Rome' in so binds them to Rome an rest is just as valid as an action.

The key here is to catch who fabricated the populace bound to obligations as citizens of Rome. This goes hand in hand with the doctrine of carelessness (finders/keepers) what you don't claim becomes the interest of whoever claims (proclaims) it. What really happened with the general proclamation? The general in so channelled the populaces' affluence to Rome but the populace allowed it by not claiming otherwise. In the above example the definition of what is a 'Citizen' was created by the State. It is understood that you have a claim of right but only if through self responsibility you exercise it!

All this happens through what is known as the law of the creator which can work for you and can work against you if you don't catch its significance. Let's examimine IT a little more closely.

Since the country created your FIRSTNAME SECONDNAME FAMILYNAME as an account or tracking mechanism based on your family and given names, they own IT. Inherent in that definition are all the obligations owing to to IT. You do this by being ITS body in the non-fiction world. This is the Law of the Creator - whoever creates owns.

IF you with your mark or your acceptance permit in truth that IT (your name in full CAPS) is you, then you in acknowledging IT bring IT into existence. By attaching yourself to IT you effectively become IT.

In the process of binding yourself to IT authority effectively owns you as they created it and behind the scenes you do not distinguish yourself from their creation. Like the firmamentN Originality Cat on paper IT only exists as fiction not in reality. After all isn't your estate in the FULL CAPS name, the legal name on your matrimony license, your birth certificate, your drivers licence. Now everything you move belongs to the State, not you. .?

And are you not under all and any rules and regulations that governs IT and which IT is thesis to?

Welcome to 'The Matrix'. . Yet of all your obligations to the State that power is siphoned from you as you shepherd do not have full benefit of everything you have earned through the results of efforts.

Think of 'IT' the position of citizen as the lowest office in direction that you are contractually bound to. As in the movie, unknown to you, your power is harnessed during you live in the illusion that you exist as a free man/woman in a free world. Now you are totally at the mercy of any influence be it a draw an inference or a policy enforcer of the State aka police force ). You are therefore under governments operating rules and procedures (statute law) - you have no rights as you have subjected your natural prerogative to that of your boss, the State. From an ethical and moral basis this is a perverted twisted version of the natural order. Unless of course you quit your office and know you have that option.

If you deliberation sovereign was created by men to serve men, this in our legalized matrix reality is the opposite. Therefore master being a third order entity is naturally subservient to man or should be.

Yet minister the reverse is justifiable. Government was created by man. Ironically it took the atrocities of war for nation states to formally recognize that man's law is not supreme.

Through the Geneva Convention, WW2 the signatory Nation States uniformly with to consideration the inherent inborn rights of man. The rules of men de jure LatinN Clergy act through contracts to set right what would be belie morally unsanctionable. Legally and ethically the State is not responsible as we have by choice though unwittingly bound ourselves to be matter to the discretion of the STATE. They recognizes that nothing, no company, no state, can minister own a mortal being nor compell him/her to do anything even under negotiate if it goes against his/her moral judgment.

Technically no national being is owned by the category or any other man but through the use of a legal entity YOURNAMEINCAPS the opposite is true. By not using it, we lose it.

If you live in the States do you know if you are a 4th amendment citizen or a 16th amendment citizen and do you know the difference? If you live in Canada are your rights protected under the Rights Trudeau introduced or the Rights that existed anterior to that under the British North America Act? Do you know which protects the national being and which protects IT?

Can nation really say your rights? Protect maybe but assert? Think about it, how can the State give you rights that you already have unless of course it is at ITS discretion. We all have become citizens of the new Rome wholly by not declaratory our humaneN Mankind rights. Government would serve us rather than those that serve Government. If it is at their discretion then who are you?

Do you know how to protect/exercise your rights? Do you know who you are? Or have you ceded IT to the State.

Now if New Rome was there to serve us that would not be an issue as everthing would be in alignment with the universal laws of the creator. Government's purpose would be to ensure that it is so. Simply said we would keep virtually 100% of what we atone through our own labour and initiative. The issue of the governed and the governors. If in principle that is not the case then this is an entirely abnormal issue.

This is the whole issue regarding redemption in law. This issue of free men being able to prosper through the results of their own labour has been with us since the beginning of civilization.

Man has always tried to dominate man and in process has impressed a legal system to exonerate it so. Nothing is new in this world. And what is responsibility nothing more that the ability to respond appropriately to fend off what is rightly yours. Understanding redemption in law is study how to take responsibility for yourself. Furthermore I would suggest that a State sanctioned Church (tax-exempt) that is loyal to the State would not act in their best interest if they taught redemption in law neither would publicly sanctioned schools. If you fail to act in your own best interest when your rights are transgressed by not notifying the transgressor than there is no one to blame other than yourself.

I may be bad but didn't the Israelites enter Egypt as free men only to be within 200 years, slaves of the State? What is the class here in that improvement book, I ask you?

I suggest it's that Redemption in Law goes along with Redemption in Spirit. It is unlikely that the STATE will come forth to confirm their claim as the ARTIFICIAL CREATION was in the first instance originates from your given and family names.

Posting a public notice stands in truth clergyman with the test of time IF no one comes forth to contest it. Understand the source of your intimation and you know where you are.

What options does one have? Well for starters, you can always claim hindmost the use of your name and all its derivatives by posting a public notice prompting anyone to come forth to contest it. Use the first few sentences of the copyright notice when you post your notice in the paper and signal that the rest can be found at the your http://www.copyright-name.com web page address to to save on the cost of posting the whole thing.

The copyright notice claims the use of your family and given names rear to you - it states no one has the prestige to use it except with your permission. Weekly for 4 weeks in a local paper where legal notices are producing is considered a reasonable notice. Be aware that when you do not claim or default to claim, pastor the STATE assumes negligence and claims ownership by default.

Since the STATE assumes through all the contracts you signed with them that you are your NAME in CAPs (which they have control over), you may wish to void and supercede those contracts with another contract. As it is derived from your family and given names you being the source have first claim but only if you have ones say it. This new come to terms once notarized will further validate your claim delivery you exclusive use of your name in all its variations.

The 'Security Agreement' is the negotiate that becomes legal proof that you are not the words 'FIRSTNAME SECONDNAME FAMILYNAME' as our FIRSTNAME SECONDNAME FAMILYNAME' is a name created by the state. You can do this by making a stipulate with that legal entity your NAME in CAPS and since you have signing influence for it this is as regards accessible to do. Like a fish in water IT is so much a part of your surroundings you don't even know IT exists.

To summarize, as a social being you belong to a family group 'Lastname' with the given names 'Firstname Secondname'. Anything created by man or country like the word 'cat' doesn't exist in the globe of nature (except as marks on paper) and so 'IT' is a fiction.

Welcome to the earth of DOUBLETHINK the globe of 1984 that George Orwell was alluding to, the veritable 'Matrix' since nothing is what it appears to be where the Ministry of Peace is the Ministry of War. Either you protect your rights by serving notice of transgressions or by acquiescence lose them.

NOTE you are always the agent ( have signing patronage ) for your IT, you like the word 'cat' on a piece of paper are nevermore your FIRSTNAME SECONDNAME FAMILYNAME, the fiction.

If you have an US check, notice that the signature line typically has the letters MP printed beside it which stands for micro print. As such you are a creation of the natural firmamentN Originality (God if you will) and as a second order entity (God is the 1st) nothing has any right over you (except your creator) - but here's the catch - only if you take on trust it and act accordingly! If someone transgresses your rights to your name it is up to you to give them notice that there was a trespass and there are penalties that will incur if they form a series to do so.

By default the STATE assumes you always are the legal entity FIRSTNAME SECONDNAME FAMILYNAME owned by the STATE unless you stand for otherwise. If you examine the signature line closely you will see that it is not a line at all but is in verity tiny legal compose repeating the words 'AUTHORIZEDBYAUTHORIZEDBYAUTHORIZEDBYAUTHORIZEDBY' Now you know why - a fiction can not sign anything itself it needs someone to act on ITs behalf and to speculate you speculation you were IT.

Its about time you got rid of that tag IT and stuck to the dictum, give to Ceasars what is Caesars and give to God what is God's and have the understanding to distinguish the difference, Knowing that you have a better luck to keep 100% of what is rightfully yours and will taken steps ecclesiastic to ensure it.

I presume this clarifies who you are so you behave accordingly and commence quick in the earth of abundance rather than the earth of 'scare city'.

Out of abundance he took abundance and out of abundance abundance remains - Upanishads

"........"

Additional Articles From - Home | Society
  • basketball ~ Basketball Coaching ~ ncaa - By : Tony Scott
  • prius ~ DefaultValue@ThisisdefaultValue.usersshouldfillininformation.com ~ honda - By : Curtis Reddehase
  • If you want to view properties from two extremes you can try estate agents in Battersea to estate agents in the Isle of Dogs - By : Steve Silvester
  • work ~ work ~ I love you, the other way. ~ small ~ small - By : geo katsa
  • Peaches Uniform Print Tops – Working Hard So You Do Not Have To - By : iSnare Articles
  • christmas gift basket ideas ~ Christmas Gift Basket Ideas – Theme Your Holiday Gifts ~ Christmas gift baskets - By : iSnare Articles
  • Internet ~ Electo-Isolation At Issue For Generation Online ~ young adults - By : iSnare Articles
  • America ~ Aliens with no brains have replaced the majority of the American people! ~ the United States - By : Peter Cross
  • evil ~ On the Nature of Evil ~ psychology - By : Peter Cross
  • Gambling ~ How Legalized Online Gambling is Better for Society ~ ban - By : ellie schneider


  • RSS XML Search N Find Articles
    Click the XML Icon Above to Receive Society Articles Via our RSS system!

    straw man ~ What's in your NAME? - Les Raketti Copyright-name.com ~ all caps name


    Partners

    Powered by Article Dashboard